A lack of support in the first push to add a same-gender marriage ban to Indiana’s constitution makes no difference to the right in their efforts to deny homosexuals equal legal protection. The first proposed amendment was largely criticized for potentially denying domestic partnership benefits to same-gender couples that would otherwise be permitted by their employer. As if to say, “O.k… so we will give gays those rights, but not any more,” the legislature is at it again – this time in a shockingly bipartisan push.
Although Indiana already has a law banning same-gender marriages, supporters of the measure note that Courts are overturning such legislation all over the country. Thus, the basis for them to push forward with a constitutional amendment seems to be that the current law, because it is discriminatory and violates Due Process, might be overturned – so to protect it, we have to make it part of the Constitution.
The argument is indicative of a cause suffering from its own lack of rational thought and legal backing.
One of the strongest and most believed lies has been that providing civil marriage benefits to same-gender couples would result in churches being forced into performing religious ceremonies recognizing those relationships and such would be a violation of their religious freedoms. Nothing could be further from the truth. Reverend Al Sharpton responded to this allegation by stating:
Even though we live under the law in a secular democratic society, religious groups must still be able to maintain their spiritual and moral option to either give or withhold a religious or sacred blessing to such unions.
He went on to declare:
However, the government should not have that option. It must affirm the human and legal rights of everyone.
The desperation in the voices of marriage inequality supporters can further be illustrated by their continued arguments (by way of the American Family Association *which would be more properly called the Anti-Family Association* that same-gender marriage will:
- bankrupt social security (which same-gender couples pay into);
- result in children being taught about homosexual sex in school;
- result in the violation of the sanctity of their own marriage;
- lead to instant, drive-through divorces similar to obtaining a hunting license;
- “Perhaps most important, the spread of the Gospel of Jesus Christ will be severely curtailed. The family has been God’s primary vehicle for evangelism since the beginning.”
- “The culture war will be over.”
Some of the above are paraphrased, some are direct quotes when paraphrasing cannot do the ridiculousness of the argument justice. To expose this blatant lie, let’s ask: what is the “culture war”? The phrase “culture war” is generally used to describe the conflict between progressives and traditionalists and includes such hot debates as censorship, abortion, separation of church and state, gun control, and homosexuality. Obviously, the introduction of same-gender marriage will instantly dissolve the conflicts surrounding gun control, censorship, abortion and church involvement in state matters. [insert sarcastic tone here].
It is unfortunate that “religious values”, which are generally respected, are being abused and degraded by the spread of LIES. Yes, I’m calling them liars, a word I seldom use. Liars are sinners… and since I am an atheist and thus free from “sin”, I can cast that stone.
The AFA is lying to you, they are trying to scare you, they are trying to use our fears against us and they are losing. They are losing because we have been a country ruled by fear for far too long and people are recognizing those tactics when they hear them. People are asking questions and getting make-shift, unreasonable answers. People are calling the AFA out on their lies and demanding they support their allegations – and they can’t. Keep asking questions, keep demanding answers and expose these groups for the power hungry, lying people that they are.
See: New proposal to ban gay marriage protects partner benefits | IndyStar